不同内固定治疗跟骨骨折的疗效(1)
 |
| 第1页 |
参见附件。
【摘要】目的比较解剖型钢板(AP)与锁定钢板(LCP)治疗有移位的跟骨骨折的疗效。方法2005年1月~2011年2月33例跟骨关节内骨折分别行解剖型钢板(AP)与锁定钢板(LCP)内固定，对其疗效进行回顾性分析，比较两种治疗方法的疗效。结果所有患者均顺利通过手术，32例足术后获得随访6～24个月(平均13个月)。优良率：解剖型钢板(AP)优良率70.0%，锁定钢板(LCP)优良率91.6%。结论解剖型钢板治疗涉及关节面的有移位的骨折优良率较低，并发症多，解剖型锁定板优良率高，并发症少，统计学分析有显著性差异，可以作为首选。
【关键词】跟骨骨折；骨折固定术
Comparison of different surgical methods in treatment of calcaneal fracture HU Yong-jun,TANG Rui-xin,LIANG Qi.The First Peoples Hospital of Huainan,Huainan 232007,China
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo compare the therapeutic effect of anatomic plate(AP) and locking compression plate(LCP) in treatment of calcaneal fracture.Methods33 patients with calcaneal fracture were treated with anatomic plate(AP)and locking compression plate(LCP).The therapeutic effects were compared in the study.ResultsAll operations were done successfully.Of all,32 patients were followed up for 6-24 months.Excellence rate: AP was 70.0% and LCP was 91 ......
您现在查看是摘要介绍页，详见PDF附件。